Program evaluation and review technique (PERT)

What is the Program Evaluation and Review Technique?

The program evaluation and review technique (PERT) is used to manage a project. It identifies every task associated with a project, the time required to complete each one, and the dependencies between tasks. The result is a network diagram, known as a PERT chart, that clarifies where the critical path is located in a project. The critical path is that sequence of tasks that requires the longest total time period to complete. There may be several paths within a PERT chart, each comprised of a different set of interrelated tasks that must be completed. Whichever path has the longest duration is the critical path, since shrinking this path will compress the duration of the entire project.

The critical path must be closely monitored to ensure that a project is completed in a timely manner. This means that an essential activity for a project manager is to monitor the PERT chart on a daily basis. If a task on the critical path is delayed, this also delays the entire project. A remedial action is to overload tasks on the critical path with additional resources.

PERT allows for the inclusion of variable amounts of time for each task. Thus, each task has a most likely, pessimistic, and optimistic duration attached to it. These three estimates are then combined to arrive at a single estimated duration for each task. This probability feature means that PERT is especially useful when dealing with projects for which there is some uncertainty about completion dates.

Related AccountingTools Courses

Project Accounting

Project Management

Disadvantages of the Program Evaluation and Review Technique

There are several disadvantages to using the program evaluation and review technique. They are as follows:

  • Significant data requirements. A large amount of data that must be incorporated into the PERT planning process. This makes it expensive to maintain, which usually limits its usefulness to larger and more complex projects. Also, if the data input into the system is incorrect, then the entire schedule is likely to be unreliable.

  • High level of subjectivity. The time required to complete each task is highly subjective, so a PERT chart might mistakenly identify an incorrect critical path. This problem can be corrected by continually revising task durations with the latest and most up-to-date estimates.

  • Complex and time-consuming. PERT can be difficult to understand and implement, especially for large projects with many tasks. This means that a skilled staff person is needed to operate the associated software, which increases the cost of a project.

  • Difficult to maintain. Projects often change due to unforeseen factors, and updating the PERT chart can be complex and tedious. This results in extra time requirements to maintain the schedule, which can be expensive.

  • Does not consider resource constraints. PERT does not account for resource constraints like labor, materials, or finances. This can lead to unrealistic schedules if resources are not adequately managed.

  • Less efficient for short-term or simple projects. PERT is best suited for large-scale projects; smaller projects may not need such detailed analysis. Simpler tools like Gantt charts may be more practical for smaller projects.