Risk of material misstatement definition
/What is the Risk of Material Misstatement?
The risk of material misstatement is the risk that the financial statements of an organization have been misstated to a material degree. This risk is assessed by auditors at the two levels noted below. When the risk of material misstatement is high, the level of detection risk is lowered (increases the amount of evidence obtained from substantive procedures). Doing so reduces the overall audit risk.
Risk of material misstatement at the assertion level. This risk is further subdivided into inherent risk and control risk. Inherent risk is the susceptibility of an assertion to misstatement because of error or fraud, before considering controls. Control risk is the risk of misstatement that will not be prevented or detected by a reporting entity's internal controls.
Risk of material misstatement at the financial statement level. The risk of material misstatement at the financial statement level relates to the financial statements as a whole. This is a key risk to address, because a high risk makes it difficult for an auditor to issue an unqualified audit opinion. There are multiple factors that can increase this risk, including declining economic conditions, ineffective accounting systems, poor oversight by the board of directors, and the incompetence of management. It is also possible that rapid changes within the industry are increasing this risk.
Related AccountingTools Courses
Example of the Risk of Material Misstatement
Tuna Corporation is a technology company that develops and sells software. As part of its operations, the company recognizes revenue from multi-year software licensing agreements that include both upfront payments and ongoing service components. Revenue from these contracts is material to the financial statements. The inherent risk and control risk associated with its operations are noted below.
Inherent Risk
Inherent risk arises from the nature of the revenue recognition process itself, regardless of controls. The sources of the company’s inherent risk are:
Complexity of standards. Revenue recognition for multi-element contracts must comply with accounting standards like ASC 606 or IFRS 15, which involve detailed and subjective judgments about performance obligations, timing, and allocation of transaction prices.
Judgment and estimation. Management must estimate the standalone selling prices of software licenses and services, which can be subjective and prone to error or bias.
Fraud risk. Pressure to meet revenue targets may lead management to prematurely recognize revenue or manipulate estimates.
Timing issues. Improper cut-off at period-end can lead to recognizing revenue in the wrong period.
Control Risk
Control risk arises when internal controls fail to prevent or detect misstatements in revenue recognition. The sources of the company’s control risk are:
Weak contract review process. The company may lack formal processes to review multi-element contracts for proper identification and allocation of performance obligations.
Ineffective IT systems. The revenue recognition system may not adequately track revenue allocation for contracts, leading to errors.
Segregation of duties. If the same individual is responsible for drafting contracts, recording revenue, and approving financial reports, there is a higher risk of error or fraud.
Insufficient monitoring. Management may not regularly monitor revenue recognition practices, increasing the risk of undetected misstatements.